Ascoli Cagliari Scorer: Falco essentially the most proactive, poor protection and assault – VOTES
Ascoli and Cagliari met on the Cino i Lillo del Duca stadium within the match legitimate for the tenth spherical of Serie B.
Ascoli e Cagliari they confronted one another on the Cino and Lillo del Duca stadium within the match legitimate for the tenth day of Sequence B. The bulletins to the protagonists of the match.
RADUNOVIC 4.5: Trigger the penalty with the participation of Altare and Capradossi. Unhealthy defensive disengagement within the eightieth minute with the aim by Pedro Mendes (who took over from Ascoli’s different scorer, Dionisi).
DI PARDO 5: He tries it with raids and resolutions and takes his job, but it surely does not have an effect on the remainder of the crew.
ALTAR 4.5: Defensive dysfunction within the 1-0 aim with the collaboration of Radunovic and Capradossi who lose Lungoyi (finds the penalty then transformed by Dionisi). Pedro Mendes is misplaced and intervenes too late within the eightieth minute: the 2-0 aim is served.
CAPRADOSSI 5: Disgrace as a result of other than the defensive mess with Radunovic and Altare within the 1-0 aim, he had an sufficient sport. He approaches the aim of 2-2, solely Guarna tells him no. Attacker added to the ultimate boarding – not definitely worth the transfer.
CARBON 6: A sport performed with order: it’s proposed in assault, it’s cautious in protection. The most effective of the rossoblùs within the first half. A pity for the results of the match.
NANDEZ 5: An encouraging begin to the match, however then it will get misplaced within the shirts of the Juventus midfielders. He proposes and runs as a full-back after the departure of Di Pardo, however he’s too sterile. Good run within the 90′ on the underside line and cross by Rog (saved by Guarna).
MAKOUMBOU 5: Good begin to the sport with ball exits on foot and exact passes to the surface and to the midfielders. Ball possession, nevertheless, too sterile. It will get misplaced within the second half.
DEIOLA 5: It impacts little and the possession is excessively sterile. Their sport can be nameless, too complicated.
FALCO 5.5: Good within the first half and in addition within the second. He proposes, involves get the ball in the course of the sector and proposes to his teammates. He comes out at 65′ most likely as a result of he does not have 90′ in his legs.
PAVOLETTI 5: As captain and with Lapadula on the sector, he discovered the aim that reactivated the illusions a couple of minutes from the top of the sport. Too remoted, his companions search for him and discover him little. Solely partially stops for the aim.
FORM 5: Not the very best model of the man that made followers fall in love. Too removed from the rossoblues maneuvers, maybe the worst of the primary half. It’s trapped by the covers of Collocolo and Simic. Finest if you swap lanes on the entrance to Millico. Nonetheless, he will get three Ascoli gamers to put on yellow: Simic, Adjapong and Falasco. It is not about explosiveness.
LAPADULA 4.5: Enters the sector within the sixty fifth minute and touches the primary harmful ball within the 79th minute. He harpoons it within the penalty space, however manages it badly. For the remaining, quite a lot of malice to the rivals (actually invigorated by the whistles of Cino and Lillo del Duca) with out realizing, nevertheless, to the benefit of the crew.
MILLIC 4.5: He is available in and passes to Luvumbo on the other aspect who performs higher than the remainder of the sport – maybe the one optimistic of his sport. Wrap within the 93′ a ball properly served within the space.
ROG sv: He is again after an harm layoff with the appropriate angle. He tries and is seen by his teammates: a excessive shot on the crossbar and a save by Guarna.
#Ascoli #Cagliari #Scorer #Falco #proactive #poor #protection #assault #VOTES