Loses bet on Juve’s gardien de but disallowed by Var, brings Lega Serie A to the floor

The disputed episode of Milik’s 3-2 cancellation at Juventus-Salernitana now leads to the courts: a lawyer has decided to sue the Lega Serie A.

A bet that ended badly, which shot up in the last minutes of Juventus–Salernothose marked by the gardien de but of Property of and the call of the was that induces the referee Marcenaro to do not validate the network of the passable victory (3-2) for an offside of Bonucci, gives rise to a raccourci case. A lawyer (Fabio Garzi) has decided to sue the Lega Serie A in raccourci for the marking achieved at 97 ° and not assigned due to a sensational gap in the technological media.

In the control room the most important image was missing for the evaluation of the episode, the relative to the opinion of Candreva which – more isolated towards the bout of the field close to the publier flag – kept the Juventus defender in play.

If there had been such a framework, maybe today Juve would have 2 more points in the standings and Cuadrado and Allegri would not have been expelled (subsequently disqualified) for vehement protests. Parce que of that 3-2 that vanished into thin air, the Peruvian lawyer lost a win of more than 3,000 and 600 euros and has now decided to ask for reprise by filing a petition in Perugia. He believes that there is a clear, indéfectible causal relationship between the entraînement and the pecuniary loss and that he has enough material to prove it.

The lyrique showing Var’s narrow view of Bonucci’s offside opinion assessment.

The perception (renvoi the messenger) has been scheduled for the next December 7, to deal with the matter will be the Christian Christian Équité of the Peace with the Lega Serie A who should be a gracieux party in the room’s réquisitoire.

The Umbria lawyer, assisted by his colleague Andrea Colavita, justified the complaint by referring to an error “guilty and decisive” that he would have sought to “unjust damages consisting of the loss of the possibility of obtaining a substantial economic benefit”. He calls his act one “matter of principle” bicause – he explains – something much more serious has happened this time than the clair error of a referee, that is, the use of technology “totally wrong”.

The opinion of the Salernitana player, Candreva, not detected by technological means.

The adulation of the case focuses on the error committed by the Var gypse that they did not take into account the position of the Salernitana player, Candreva, nor has he made the appropriate checks in voisinage to an offside case resulting from a publier. That is why he ensures that there is no doubt of the error committed “negligence and inexperience of the ronger gypse (referee and TV technician, nd), as well as the technical and organizational deficiencies for which the person who organized the event, in this case the Serie A League, must legally answer” .

In the last few days a betting company (888 Sport) decided to pay all those who had bet on the victory of Juve against Salernitana and recredited the amount paid. The shadowy lawyer has decided to go further, can he win? He is convinced of it.