no night for Di Bello however the penalty was there

When the appointment of Di Bello for Sampdoria-Roma appeared, Mourinho in all probability had half a shot: the precedents of the Brindisi whistle with the Giallorossi weren’t totally adverse (13 hits, 7 attracts, 6 KOs) however between the referee and the Particular sure. no unhealthy blood. Final time with beautiful main the Giallorossi was on April 18, 2022, Napoli-Roma 1-1 at Maradona and there was a present from the Portuguese coach within the press room.

Rome, the precedent of Di Bello that outraged Mourinho

The Giallorossi nearly equalized on the finish however second Mourinho have been broken by each Var Di Paolo and Di Bello. The outburst of the Roma coach was vehement: “He did me be ashamed to be right here It appears to me that there are ten video games that Roma haven’t gained with him”. Yesterday on the Var there was additionally one other outdated acquaintance, that Aureliano who made Mou explode once more in a stick in Milan: “You must preserve calm and preserve quiet. In a uncertain case the referee can’t be known as. Drink the tea, the beer, however let it go.”

Rome, Di Bello doesn’t persuade Luigi Ferraris

How Di Bello did final night time within the race won 1-0 for Roma to Luigi Ferraris? For the Corriere dello sport he deserves a 4: “he misses a penalty (later awarded with the assistance of VAR) and doesn’t culpably draw a crimson within the course of Verre, who intervened along with his proper leg stretched and bitten. christian. The contact with the arm (exterior the world) of El Shaarawy within the launch of the identical Verre was additionally sensational: a night to neglect”.

Roma and Di Bello, all disputed circumstances

Not solely is there the unseen penalty awarded solely because of the intervention of Var by Di Bello, who needed to warn 8 gamers to maintain Sampdoria-Roma underneath management. To sign the contact with the arm of The Shaarawy exterior the world: VAR can’t intervene, however Di Bello’s mistake (nicely positioned) is apparent.

The Italo-Egyptian would have deserved a yellow card which Samp coach Dejan took as a substitute Stankovic, livid on the refereeing oversight. The Var on this case was unable to intervene as a result of it’s not a case of a direct crimson for the reason that motion has advanced in the direction of the surface and due to this fact the aim alternative was not acknowledged clearly. Zaniolo who matches the road of the Sampdoria defenders, dribbles previous Audero and scores a aim however is offside.

Roma, for Marelli it’s right to assign the penalty

The important thing episode is the one within the fifth minute: on Abraham’s cross for Pellegrini, the referee Marco Di Bello receives a sign from the VAR for the penalty beforehand claimed by Roma. Aureliano within the management room affirmation: there’s a handball from Ferrari within the Sampdoria penalty space and the penalty is awarded to the Giallorossi.

To make clear it’s Luca Marelli. Dazn’s knowledgeable says: “These hand touches are unattainable to see, that is what VAR is for. The contact of the hand is there, even when it’s not very clear. The proper arm could be very broad, that is why it was the penalty with cause assigned No disciplinary measures as a result of the conclusion just isn’t aimed on the door».